Commons:Quality images candidates
These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.
Purpose[edit]
The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.
Guidelines[edit]
All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.
For nominators[edit]
Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.
Image page requirements[edit]
- Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
- Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
- Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
- No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.
Creator[edit]
Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.
Technical requirements[edit]
More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.
Resolution[edit]
Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.
Image quality[edit]
Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.
Composition and lighting[edit]
The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.
Value[edit]
Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.
How to nominate[edit]
Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ |}}
The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}
Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.
Number of nominations[edit]
No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.
Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.
Evaluating images[edit]
When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.
How to review[edit]
Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.
- If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}
to
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}
In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.
- If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}
to
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}
In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.
Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.
Grace period and promotion[edit]
If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.
How to execute decision[edit]
QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.
If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.
If promoted,
- Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
- Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
- Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 2024.
- Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.
If declined,
- move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 2024.
- Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
- Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
- Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red
Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)[edit]
Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 04 2024 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.
Consensual review process[edit]
Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.
How to ask for consensual review[edit]
To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.
Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.
Consensual review rules[edit]
See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules
Page refresh: purge this page's cache
Nominations[edit]
Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:
--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 05:43, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
- Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
- Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
- If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms
January 4, 2024[edit]
-
- Nomination House in the center of Ardez, Bröl dadaint 18. (Detail)
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 4 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination House in the center of Ardez, Bröl dadaint 18. (Detail)
-
- Nomination: House in the center of Ardez, Bröl dadaint 18. (Detail)
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 4 January 2024 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: House in the center of Ardez, Bröl dadaint 18. (Detail)
-
- Nomination Ardez Castle Ruins. View from the Steinsberg plateau of the surrounding mountains.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 4 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Ardez Castle Ruins. View from the Steinsberg plateau of the surrounding mountains.
-
- Nomination Observation deck in "Seelaub" natural forest reserve --Plozessor 05:14, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Frog in Tambach game reserve --Plozessor 05:14, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Head of an old wayside shrine with 14 Holy Helpers in a chapel in Augsfeld --Plozessor 05:14, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View from Katajanokka towards northern harbour in Helsinki --Plozessor 05:14, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: View into the park of Untermerzbach castle --Plozessor 05:14, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Cathedral of Logrono, La Rioja, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Plaza del Coso 2 in Viana, Navarre, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Casa Anoa y Busto in Viana, Navarre, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Town hall of Viana, Navarre, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Tympanum of the St Peter church in Viana, Navarre, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Commemorative plaque “The Dashed Line That Surrounds You Marks The Former Location of an Embarcadero Freeway Column” on the Ferry Building, San Francisco, California, USA --XRay 04:38, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:09, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Inscription at the entrance to the National AIDS Memorial Grove in Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, California, USA --XRay 04:38, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:10, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Pier 39 towards the city, San Francisco, California, USA --XRay 04:38, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Performing Arts building at Rio Rancho High School, New Mexico --Lorax 04:35, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Petroglyph at Rinconada Canyon, New Mexico --Lorax 04:35, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Park on Johannaweg with Pyramid Ballon in the background, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Maria Wörth from Hans-Pruscha-Weg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Werzer`s boathouse on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villa Vullriede on Annastraße #38 with the Mühlbach (mill brook) in front, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villa on Annastraße #34, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hogwarts Castle logo. --Rjcastillo 01:39, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winter Dance Event Ticket. --Rjcastillo 01:39, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:07, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Butter beer. --Rjcastillo 01:39, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Chilean German Industrial High School Monument. --Rjcastillo 01:39, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arturo Prat bust, Square Juan XXIII. --Rjcastillo 01:39, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:07, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A replica of Mir at the Cite de l'Espace in Toulouse, France --Mike Peel 01:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Carousel horse at Dunham Massey Hall gardens --Mike Peel 01:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Carousel horses at Dunham Massey Hall gardens --Mike Peel 01:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Carousel horse at Dunham Massey Hall gardens --Mike Peel 01:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata, Kyrgyzstan.The petroglyph depicts an ibex. --Bgag 00:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Balbal in Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata, Kyrgyzstan --Bgag 00:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Street sign in Yrdyk, Kyrgyzstan --Bgag 00:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Horse in Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata, Kyrgyzstan --Bgag 00:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jayma Bazaar, Osh, Kyrgyzstan --Bgag 00:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Animated plan of the console of the St Sulpice church Organ in Paris --Smcj~frwiki 00:30, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
January 3, 2024[edit]
-
- Nomination The Langenberg, highest mountain of North Rhine-Westphalia, seen from the northwest. --Milseburg 23:13, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:18, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: House from middle over Dnieper land and St Paraskeva Church from Zarubyntsi --Ввласенко 21:30, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Photographs thrown into a street. --Touam 21:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Deligeorgis Mansion, Athens. --C messier 21:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: The town hall of Gytheio. --C messier 21:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Azumaya and Abeno Harukas in the reflection at keitakuen, Osaka, Japan. --Laitche 17:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Support Beyond the already excellent image, this extraordinary opposition between two worlds deserves promotion. --Smcj~frwiki 01:38, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Honda HR-V Hybrid at Auto Zuerich 2021 --Alexander-93 16:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Volkswagen ID.7 at Auto Zuerich 2023 --Alexander-93 16:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:55, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Polyommatus escheri on a Lavandula angustifolia, in the Cadí-Moixeró Natural Park (province of Barcelona, Spain). --Balles2601 15:17, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Gentianella campestris flowers in The Valley of Nuria (Girona, Spain). --Balles2601 15:17, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ercé 19:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Podarcis guadarramae ssp. guadarramae in the municipality of Rascafría (Community of Madrid, Spain). --Balles2601 15:17, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:54, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lixus cardui on a cottonthistle (Onopordum sp.), in Ambroz Lake (Madrid, Spain). --Balles2601 15:17, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:54, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Oligotrophus schmidti gall on a Juniperus oxycedrus, in Bustarviejo (Community of Madrid, Spain). --Balles2601 15:17, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
This is a bit noisy too --Plozessor 19:54, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination White-lipped tree frog (Nyctimystes infrafrenatus) --Charlesjsharp 11:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 13:40, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Dingo (Canis lupus dingo) --Charlesjsharp 11:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Dingo (Canis lupus dingo) --Charlesjsharp 11:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Laitche 17:11, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dingo (Canis lupus dingo) --Charlesjsharp 11:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 13:40, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus setosus) --Charlesjsharp 11:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Laitche 17:11, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Young child surrounded by pigeons, Istanbul. --DimiTalen 11:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: High Atlas, Morocco. --DimiTalen 11:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: High Atlas, Morocco. --DimiTalen 11:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mercedes-Benz S214 300e in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 11:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mercedes-Benz C254 400e in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 11:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Fiat 600e in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 11:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Royal Basilica of Saint Francis the Great, Madrid, Spain --Poco a poco 10:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Laitche 17:07, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Royal Basilica of Saint Francis the Great, Madrid, Spain --Poco a poco 10:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 20:00, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Royal Basilica of Saint Francis the Great, Madrid, Spain --Poco a poco 10:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Royal Basilica of Saint Francis the Great, Madrid, Spain --Poco a poco 10:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 20:00, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Royal Basilica of Saint Francis the Great, Madrid, Spain --Poco a poco 10:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:11, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Houses in the World Heritage Site Hoi An Ancient Town, Vietnam --Carschten 10:19, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:36, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gate of the Fujian Assembly Hall, Hoi An, Vietnam --Carschten 10:19, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:36, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Houses in the World Heritage Site Hoi An Ancient Town, Vietnam --Carschten 10:19, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:36, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Telescopic skid steer loader JCB 3ts-8w at Agritechnica 2023 --MB-one 10:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:36, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Interior of an Embraer Lineage 1000 at EBACE 2019 --MB-one 10:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ticket machine to the viewing point of Holtenau lock, Kiel --MB-one 10:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination eggs of western yellow wagtail (iberiaie) - Oeufs de Bergeronnette printanière (iberiaie) --Ercé 08:56, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination eggs of western yellow wagtail (iberiaie) - Oeufs de Bergeronnette printanière (iberiaie) --Ercé 08:56, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gais AR railway station with shuttle trains Gais - Altstätten - Gais --JoachimKohler-HB 08:26, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Nikkor AF-S DX 18-55 mm f:3.5-5.6G VR II 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Slight ccw tilt --Poco a poco 10:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)@Poco a poco: Done--Jacek Halicki 13:49, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nikkor AF-S DX 18-55 mm f:3.5-5.6G VR II 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 20:00, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nikkor AF-S DX 18-55 mm f:3.5-5.6G VR II 3 --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vaporesso GEN 80S and Alberich II MTL --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:34, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Medal of Merit for the City of Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Montreux-Berner Oberland Railway (MOB) BDe 4/4 luggage railcar no. 3002 at Zweisimmen station, Canton of Berne --JoachimKohler-HB 08:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:46, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Anfitrite e Tritão --Mike Peel 08:16, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Looks tilted --Poco a poco 10:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
@Poco a poco: Thanks for looking, perspective tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anfitrite e Tritão --Mike Peel 08:16, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Fonderie du Val d'Osne: Veado Lutando Com Três Tigres --Mike Peel 08:16, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination São Paulo School of Arts and Crafts: Laocoon group --Mike Peel 08:16, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dwarf valerian (Valeriana supina) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:05, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:40, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grave of Iulia Hașdeu in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania
Oppose not signed --Plozessor 20:01, 3 January 2024 (UTC) - Decline {{{2}}}
- Nomination Grave of Iulia Hașdeu in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania
-
- Nomination Grave of Iulia Hașdeu in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania
Oppose not signed --Plozessor 20:01, 3 January 2024 (UTC) - Decline {{{2}}}
- Nomination Grave of Iulia Hașdeu in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania
-
- Nomination 21 Bulevardul Carol I, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 07:54, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Lacks sharpness --Poco a poco 10:47, 3 January 2024 (UTC) - Decline {{{2}}}
- Nomination 21 Bulevardul Carol I, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 07:54, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 21 Bulevardul Carol I, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 07:54, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination 21 Bulevardul Carol I, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 07:54, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:37, 4 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination 21 Bulevardul Carol I, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 07:54, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A northeast view of Tamarama --DXR 07:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A northeast view of Quay Quarter Tower, Sydney --DXR 07:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A north view of Chace Range, as seen from Flinders Ranges Highway --DXR 07:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A northwest view of Stenhouse Bay Jetty --DXR 07:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A southwest view of Bondi Beach --DXR 07:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Burgpreppach Castle --Ermell 07:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:11, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Burgpreppach Castle --Ermell 07:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Main portal, parish church St. Genesius, Riedböhringen, Germany --Llez 06:19, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: West facade, parish church St. Genesius, Riedböhringen, Germany --Llez 06:19, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Hotel Engiadina in Scuol.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Hotel Engiadina in Scuol.
-
- Nomination House in the center of Scuol, Rablüzza.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination House in the center of Scuol, Rablüzza.
-
- Nomination De Heining pumping station (Marrum)
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination De Heining pumping station (Marrum)
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine in Abersfeld --Plozessor 05:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:15, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Röthengrund" nature reserve north of Sonneberg --Plozessor 05:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marigold near Gädheim --Plozessor 05:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion A bit too dark for me, but good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine near Wonfurt --Plozessor 05:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:15, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Buttercup in "Weilersbachtal" nature reserve --Plozessor 05:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Ruins of the St Peter church in Viana, Navarre, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Holy Sepulchre church in Torres Del Río, Navarre, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Mary church in Los Arcos, Navarre, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:16, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palacio de los Reyes de Navarra in Estella-Lizarra, Navarre, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cathedral of Logrono, La Rioja, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Commemorative plaque “The Dashed Line That Surrounds You Marks The Former Location of an Embarcadero Freeway Column” on the Ferry Building, San Francisco, California, USA --XRay 04:07, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hyde Street and cable car, San Francisco, California, USA --XRay 04:07, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Golden Gate Bridge in the fog from Golden Gate Bridge Vista Point, Sausalito, California, USA --XRay 04:07, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Marina Boulevard, San Francisco, California, USA --XRay 04:07, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:16, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Adam Beck Memorial, Toronto --Another Believer 04:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Lower Simcoe Street underpass murals, Toronto --Another Believer 04:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Picture is good, should have more specific filename though. --Plozessor 05:16, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lower Simcoe Street underpass murals, Toronto --Another Believer 04:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Allan Gardens Conservatory, Toronto --Another Believer 04:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Philosopher's Walk (Toronto) --Another Believer 04:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:16, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villa Tilly and Villa Martin on Johannaweg #2, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villa Tilly and Villa Martin on Johannaweg #2, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Promenade on Johannaweg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Promenade on Johannaweg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Boathouse at the park on Johannaweg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata, Kyrgyzstan. Petroglyphs depicts deers. --Bgag 00:34, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Iketsi 03:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Buildings on Nurjol Boulevard in Astana, Kazakhstan --Bgag 00:34, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. A tad too much sky. --Iketsi 03:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Street sign in Astana, Kazakhstan --Bgag 00:34, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Support Great use of the national ornamental pattern. --Iketsi 03:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
January 2, 2024[edit]
-
- Nomination: Handball: Sara Rönningen (Thüringer HC, 10). By --Stepro 23:32, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Tag des Handballs München 2023: Ann-Katrin Lüdecke (GER, team manager). By --Stepro 23:32, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Nice portrait. The skin is a bit waxy, but that’s probably unavoidable when doing noise reduction with a ISO 5,000 photo – for that the quality is remarkably good. --Aristeas 10:17, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Tag des Handballs München 2023: Axel Kromer (sports director DHB). By --Stepro 23:32, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Chevrolet Equinox LT (III, Facelift) --M 93 21:30, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mercedes-Benz C254 in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 19:24, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Volkswagen ID.7 in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 19:24, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination A black-headed gull showing his winter plumage, Lake Geneva, Switzerland. --Terragio67 18:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Iketsi 03:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination A black-headed gull showing his winter plumage, Lake Geneva, Switzerland. --Terragio67 18:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grave of Iulia Hașdeu in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:07, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Grave of Iulia Hașdeu in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Grave of Iulia Hașdeu in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Grave of Iulia Hașdeu in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Grave of Iulia Hașdeu in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Torre Eiffel, París, Francia, 2022-10-29 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 16:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Picture is good, but isn't the tower's illumination a copyrighted work of art and thus this picture violates the copyright? --Plozessor 18:07, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Good question, but a lot of pictures are in the category : Category:Eiffel Tower at night --Sebring12Hrs 19:19, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
This illumination isn't IMHO over the threshold of originality. We don't accept though pictures with illumination events (different spots are highlighted over the time) of the tower, but that's not the case here. --Poco a poco 20:41, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: San Giovanni Calibita church in Rome (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 16:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: San Francesco a Ripa in Rome (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 16:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination San Francesco a Ripa in Rome (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 16:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Maison de bois de Houdan en 2012 (by Lionel Allorge) --Sebring12Hrs 16:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: eggs of western yellow wagtail (flavissimaa) - Oeufs de Bergeronnette printanière (flavisssima) --Ercé 15:34, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Throne hall pavilion in Santichaiprakarn Park in Bangkok. --BigDom 14:33, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης 19:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Stockinette stitch in three-ply sweater (2 anthracite and 1 black) with melange effect. --Anna.Massini 13:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Under the Eiffel Tower, Paris. --DimiTalen 13:07, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Detail, Ben Youssef Madrasa, Marrakech. --DimiTalen 13:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Great cormorant at Tennōji Park in Osaka. --Laitche 12:49, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Terragio67 19:38, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Karmann Ghia at Essen Motor Show 2023 --MB-one 11:41, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Office of the African Development Bank in North Ridge, Greater Accra --MB-one 11:41, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mini car with the Ernst Thälmann Pioneer Organisation logo at Technikmuseum Pütnitz --MB-one 11:41, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Royal Basilica of Saint Francis the Great, Madrid, Spain --Poco a poco 10:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality --Laitche 12:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Royal Basilica of Saint Francis the Great, Madrid, Spain --Poco a poco 10:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Plaza Mayor, Madrid, Spain --Poco a poco 10:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Almudena Cathedral, Madrid, Spain --Poco a poco 10:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --DXR 11:55, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Almudena Cathedral, Madrid, Spain --Poco a poco 10:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --DXR 11:58, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tower of the Ecumenical Pius Luke Church in Krefeld --Carschten 10:16, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Tower of the Ecumenical Pius Luke Church in Krefeld --Carschten 10:16, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Portal of the Ecumenical Pius Luke Church in Krefeld --Carschten 10:16, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trieu Chau Assembly Hall in Hội An, Vietnam --Carschten 10:16, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An alley in the Jardin des Géants, in La Madeleine, France --Velvet 09:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cowberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:57, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Prosper Lecourtier: Leão --Mike Peel 08:53, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ricardo Cipicchia: A pega do porco --Mike Peel 08:53, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ricardo Cipicchia: A pega do porco --Mike Peel 08:53, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Ricardo Cipicchia: A pega do porco --Mike Peel 08:53, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ricardo Cipicchia: A pega do porco --Mike Peel 08:53, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Jeep Avenger 1.2 in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 08:30, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination BMW G60 520d in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 08:30, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BMW X7 in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 08:30, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A male Eurasian wren (Troglodytes troglodytes) singing in Franconville, France. --Alexis Lours 07:14, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Laitche 09:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A male Eurasian kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) in flight in Franconville, France. --Alexis Lours 07:14, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A male Eurasian kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) in flight in Franconville, France. --Alexis Lours 07:14, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Laitche 09:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A male Eurasian kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) in flight in Franconville, France. --Alexis Lours 07:14, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:28, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: A male Eurasian kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) in flight in Franconville, France. --Alexis Lours 07:14, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Strullendorf railway station, construction site, looking north, aerial view --Ermell 06:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:44, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the ship "Balclutha" at Hyde Street Pier, San Francisco, California, USA --XRay 06:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:44, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish church St. Genesius, Riedböhringen, Germany. --Llez 06:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Tail of storm Gerrit over the Langweerderwiels in 30 seconds. (Long exposure photography).
--Famberhorst 06:09, 2 January 2024 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Tail of storm Gerrit over the Langweerderwiels in 30 seconds. (Long exposure photography).
-
- Nomination: Coronation Park (Toronto) --Another Believer 05:34, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Shrine Peace Memorial, Toronto --Another Believer 05:34, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Coronation Park, Toronto --Another Believer 05:34, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Hiram M. Chittenden Locks, Seattle --Another Believer 05:34, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle --Another Believer 05:34, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:09, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross north of Leuzendorf --Plozessor 05:25, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:28, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Natural monument "monk's pit" near Hassfurt --Plozessor 05:25, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Protected landscape element "Struthwiese" near Hesselbach --Plozessor 05:25, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ardez Castle Ruins. Part of the castle ruins on the Steinsberg plateau.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Ardez Castle Ruins. Part of the castle ruins on the Steinsberg plateau.
-
- Nomination Ardez Castle Ruins. Part of the castle ruins on the Steinsberg plateau.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Ardez Castle Ruins. Part of the castle ruins on the Steinsberg plateau.
-
- Nomination Ardez Castle Ruins. Part of the castle ruins on the Steinsberg plateau.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Ardez Castle Ruins. Part of the castle ruins on the Steinsberg plateau.
-
- Nomination Holy Sepulchre church in Estella-Lizarra, Navarre, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Saint Michael Archangel church in Estella-Lizarra, Navarre, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of the dominican convent in Estella-Lizarra, Navarre, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Puente de la Cárcel in Estella-Lizarra, Navarre, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Estella Bus Station in Estella-Lizarra, Navarre, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Great horned owl (Bubo virginianus) in Falcon Nursery Sunkar, Almaty, Kazakhstan --Bgag 04:15, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Minaret of Dungan Mosque, Karakol, Kyrgyzstan --Bgag 04:15, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Street sign in Karakol, Kyrgyzstan --Bgag 04:15, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:10, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata, Kyrgyzstan --Bgag 04:15, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Balbal in Petroglyph Museum of Cholpon-Ata, Kyrgyzstan --Bgag 04:15, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Edelweißbad and villa Edelweiß on Hauptstraße #106 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:32, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dressing rooms at Edelweiß bath on Hauptstraße in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:32, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:09, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
January 1, 2024[edit]
-
- Nomination A walnut orchard close to the Sacramento River in Butte County, California --Frank Schulenburg 23:55, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Beautiful picture but too noisy due high ISO. Should be possible to fix during RAW conversion though. --Plozessor 05:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback, Plozessor. I've reduced the noise and I hope it's ok now. Best, --Frank Schulenburg 04:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Support Thanks! I think now you made a good compromise between noise and sharpness. --Plozessor 19:31, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Traditional Balinese Kites Design --Eka343 23:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose This violates the "no signatures in image" requirement. Still I'm curios how it was created; it looks like a poorly upscaled bitmap. If it was created digitally, it should be uploaded in SVG format. --Plozessor 05:30, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi plazessor thank you for the feedback, i alredy update my drawing and remove my watermark. For the drawing i draw it in photoshop so no svg format. Does all digital drawing here should be in SVG. I would like to read more about the rule regarding that. can you send me the link for that rule? Thanks --Eka343 00:34, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The "no signatures" rule is on the top of this page: "No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents." About the format, there is no rule that digital drawings should be in SVG, but the bitmap you nominated here is quite blurry, some parts more than others. In case you created it as a vector graphics originally, you should ideally upload it as SVG. And if you want to upload it as a bitmap instead, you should at least export it in high resolution. This file looks like you would have exported it in low resolution and then upscaled, or if it's a mixture of vector and bitmap graphics. --Plozessor 19:27, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Alley in Anafiotika, Athens. --C messier 23:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Egyptian Embassy in Athens. --C messier 23:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Mazda3 (BP) in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 19:51, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Porsche 718 Cayman S in Böblingen --Alexander-93 19:51, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:21, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Hiram M. Chittenden Locks, Seattle --Another Believer 19:42, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Digitalis canariensis at Parque del Drago, Tenerife --Mike Peel 19:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Canary Islands Chiffchaff feeding on nectar from a Pinninana planted under a Canary Islands Dragon Tree at Hijuela del Botanico, La Orotava, Tenerife. --Mike Peel 19:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Itahisa Peréz Conesa: Lo íntimo y el paisaje --Mike Peel 19:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Exterior of Iglesia de Nuestra Señora del Rosario, Puerto del Rosario --Mike Peel 19:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Arriving at the Marc Seguin gymnasium in Saint-Étienne --Touam 16:59, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Audi SQ8 --M 93 16:26, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Honda HR-V eHEV Advance (III) --M 93 16:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: M177 engine of the Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S at Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 12:20, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination A carrion crow (Corvus corone) flying in Franconville, France. --Alexis Lours 11:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: An immature common moorhen (Gallinula chloropus) swimming in Franconville, France. --Alexis Lours 11:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Castle, Luesia, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 10:56, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Church of San Esteban, Luesia, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 10:56, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support A bit noisy but IMO acceptable for a night shot. --Plozessor 05:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Hermitage of Our Lady of Puyal, Luesia, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 10:56, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mercedes-Benz C236 in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 10:38, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Munich, building of the Faculty of Earth Sciences. --Cayambe 10:31, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Weaving jamdani at BSCIC Jamdani palli --Wasiul Bahar 09:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support The lower crop is a but unfortunate but I think it's good enough for QI still --MB-one 09:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Cox'sBazar Railway Station. By User:Frameofashik --Wasiul Bahar 09:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sunflower in a garden in Horhausen --Plozessor 06:47, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review Comment I think the top crop is too tight. --Sebring12Hrs 08:18, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
@Sebring12Hrs: Done Tried to fix it, please have a look. --Plozessor 08:57, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Landscape north of Oberhaid --Plozessor 06:47, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review Comment Good, but CAs on the right tree. --Sebring12Hrs 08:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
@Sebring12Hrs: Done Please check again. --Plozessor 09:03, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: A cat looks at a lit Menorah. --Explodingcreepsr 04:15, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
December 31, 2023[edit]
-
- Nomination: Wolfie the Seawolf, the Stony Brook mascot, on the field.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Kzirkel 23:01, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Harvard Crimson face-off against Brown Bears mens ice hockey, Jan 21, 2023. Harvard number 23: Baker Shore.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Kzirkel 23:01, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Fly orchid (Ophrys insectifera) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:19, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Flower of a fly orchid (Ophrys insectifera) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:19, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Close Wing Basking of Spindasis vulcanus(Fabricius, 1775) - Common Silverline. This specimen belongs to sub species Spindasis vulcanus vulcanus (Fabricius, 1775) – Indian Common Silverline in India.This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 17:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Close Wing Basking of Spindasis vulcanus (Fabricius, 1775) - Common Silverline. This specimen belongs to sub species Spindasis vulcanus vulcanus (Fabricius, 1775) – Indian Common Silverline in India.This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 17:23, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Partial Open Wing Basking of Symphaedra nais (Forster, 1771) - Baronet .No subspecies are listed under this species in India.This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 17:20, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Partial Open Wing Nectaring of Papilio clytia Linnaeus, 1758 - Common Mime (form- dissimilis). This specimen belongs to sub species Papilio clytia clytia Linnaeus, 1758 – Oriental Common Mime in India.This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 17:18, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Crab-eating macaque (Macaca fascicularis), Monkey Forest Ubud Ubuan Bali --Eka343 17:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Damayantidwi 07:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Eka343 09:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Iglesia de San Vicente de Paúl, París, Francia, 2022-10-30 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 14:19, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Bobcat skid steer loader with forestry mulcher attachment at Agritechnica 2023 --MB-one 14:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review The machine can hardly be seen due to the distracting background. Not a quality image for me; but maybe others see it differently. -- Spurzem 15:00, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Scania Touring at Busworld Europe 2023 --MB-one 14:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Pilatus PC-21 on static display at Paris Air Show 2019 --MB-one 14:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Castle, Luesia, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 12:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 11:02, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hotel in Vorderriß, Bavaria, with bus. --Cayambe 11:04, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Mitsubishi Colt in Leinfelden-Echterdingen --Alexander-93 10:40, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Renault Koleos II in Leinfelden-Echterdingen --Alexander-93 10:40, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review Roof and side windows a bit too bright, no transition between the Renault and the vehicle behind can be seen, overall image cropped too narrowly. -- ~~~~
-
- Nomination: Crimea. Sudak --Alexxx1979 09:05, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Moscow. Krutitsy Metochion. Teremok Tower with the Holy Gate and Dormition Cathedral --Alexxx1979 09:05, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: BMW X6 M (G06) in Böblingen --Alexander-93 09:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ford Transit Custom (2023) in Böblingen --Alexander-93 09:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A morning view of Bondi Beach, looking towards southwest --DXR 08:44, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Anfitrite e Tritão --Mike Peel 08:43, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Fonderie du Val d'Osne: Veado Lutando Com Três Tigres --Mike Peel 08:43, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Emanoel Araújo: Aranha --Mike Peel 08:43, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ibirapuera Planetarium, São Paulo --Mike Peel 08:43, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Floods in the Main valley near Bad Staffelstein --Ermell 08:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Roof lantern of the St Fermin chapel in Pamplona, Navarre, Spain. --Tournasol7 06:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Palacio de Navarra in Pamplona, Navarre, Spain. --Tournasol7 06:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Monumento a los Fueros in Pamplona, Navarre, Spain. --Tournasol7 06:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
December 30, 2023[edit]
-
- Nomination: Tender Werra (A 514) at Reiherstieg, Hamburg --MB-one 21:19, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Saab 94 V4 pickup at Classic Days Berlin 2019, Kurfürstendamm, Berlin-Charlottenburg --MB-one 21:19, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: DLRG (German Lifeguard Association) rescue dog playing with it's reward toy after a rescue excercise --MB-one 21:19, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Aston Martin DBX707 in Filderstadt --Alexander-93 20:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review Good quality. --~~~~
Comment Reset to nomination. A vote without a valid signature is not acceptable. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:10, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Plateosaurus skeletal mount in the museum Ottoneum in Kassel. It is reconstructed from fossils found in Trossingen 1911. With a length of 6 meters it is only 2/3 of the size of the maximum size of a Plateosaurus. Close up of front limbs. --Kritzolina 18:52, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: BMW G60 520d in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 18:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Nissan Sentra (B17) in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 18:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Passage, Guadalest, Alicante, Spain --Poco a poco 17:57, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Luis de Lucena Chapel, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 17:57, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support OK. --C messier 21:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pantheon of the Duchess of Sevillano, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 17:57, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
The trees in foreground are disturbing, also they give the picture the impression of being tilted (which it isn't). I'd crop it around the Pantheon, maybe leave a small part of the trees visible. --Plozessor 05:43, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Done --Poco a poco 09:08, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Support Yes, looks good now! --Plozessor 19:31, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Castle of Sohail, Fuengirola, Málaga, Spain --Poco a poco 17:57, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Close Wing Nectaring of Tirumala limniace (Cramer, 1775) - Blue Tiger ( Female )This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 17:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Close Wing Nectaring of Catopsilia pomona (Fabricius, 1775) - Lemon Emigrant (Male)This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 17:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Open Wing Basking of Symphaedra nais (Forster, 1771) - Baronet .No subspecies are listed under this species in India.This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 17:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Open Wing Basking of Phalanta phalantha (Drury, 1773) - Common Leopard. This specimen belongs to sub species Phalanta phalantha phalantha (Drury, [1773]) – Oriental Common Leopard in India.This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 17:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality (added the species category). --C messier 21:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Museo del Ejército, los Inválidos, París, Francia, 2022-10-29 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 14:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --C messier 21:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Museo del Ejército, los Inválidos, París, Francia, 2022-10-29 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 14:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Adenostyles alliariae --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:31, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Anthracoceros malayanus in Lok Kawi Wildlife Park --Pangalau 14:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination The Landesamt für Umwelt (State Office for the Environment) in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of an office building that gets renovated. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Of course the building equipment in the foreground is disturbing, but as it should illustrate the construction work, this seems acceptable. --Plozessor 19:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lech above the Lech Falls, Füssen, Bavaria --Llez 06:42, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review Comment Purple CAs on the leaves and on the sky is a bit disturbing. Is it possible to reduce it ? --Sebring12Hrs 12:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the review --Llez 15:17, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Tomie Ohtake: Ultramarine --Mike Peel 06:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Emanoel Araújo: Quadrado --Mike Peel 06:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
December 29, 2023[edit]
-
- Nomination Steven Pinker in 2023, another variant in black and white by User:Cmichel67 --Tobias ToMar Maier 22:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 2.nd choice of the motive Sheer tights or pantyhose in caucasian skin and black colour with modern bikini style panty --Tobias ToMar Maier 21:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --DXR 07:53, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BMW G60 520d in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 17:57, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Unfortunately quite unfavorable lighting. Would look much better with a polarizing filter. --Plozessor 18:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Open Wing Basking of Hypolimnas bolina (Linnaeus, 1758) - Great Eggfly (Male). This specimen belongs to sub species Hypolimnas bolina jacintha (Drury, 1773) – Oriental Great Eggfly in India.This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 17:21, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Too many artifacts due high ISO. --Plozessor 18:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination San Carlo al Corso in Rome (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 13:11, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Quite dark, but it was evening and the picture seems to capture the atmosphere. --Plozessor 19:46, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rétromobile 2011 - Chevron B16 Mazda - 1970 (by Thesupermat) --Sebring12Hrs 13:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, but this is really noisy and the shadows are too dark. --Plozessor 19:46, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Anthemis rigida --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:08, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
December 28, 2023[edit]
-
- Nomination: Open Wing Nectaring of Pareronia hippia (Fabricius, 1787) - Indian Wanderer ( Male ) --TAPAN1412 17:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review Comment The background is very noisy. --Sebring12Hrs 16:43, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lélio Coluccini: A Caçadora --Mike Peel 09:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review
A bit noisy in the shades. I'd also clone out the branches on the top --MB-one 13:36, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
@MB-one: Thanks for looking, I had to crop a bit and then clone the rest of the branches out, also denoised. How does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:53, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of OVHcloud plant, Boulevard de Beaurepaire, in Roubaix, France --Velvet 08:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment A sort of bluish tint seems a bit awkward, especially in the shadow, on the road. Additionally, for remote buildings, it seems that the sharpening process does not work well. --Sebring12Hrs 12:45, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for your review. New version, a bit warmer + no sharpening, uploaded. --Velvet 09:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
I think it's better now, thanks. --Sebring12Hrs 16:53, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
December 27, 2023[edit]
-
- Nomination: Detail of Livieratos mansion, Athens. --C messier 22:07, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review Comment It leans to the left. --Sebring12Hrs 22:48, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Close wing puddling position of Catopsilia pomona (Fabricius, 1775) - Lemon Emigrant --TAPAN1412 13:59, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review Comment Cut butterfly and a just a little part of the butterfly bodies are in focus. --Sebring12Hrs 12:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Evangelical Lutheran parish church Weidhausen near Coburg, pipe organ --Ermell 08:53, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Something is off / over-denoised / wrongly cloned, please check the note I added. --Plozessor 18:07, 27 December 2023 (UTC) Done
Thanks for the review.--Ermell 14:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Roberto Vivas: Homenagem ao Tango --Mike Peel 07:45, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review Comment Perpective could be improved. Vertical of the pedestal should be vertical. In addition, the focus seems to be on the pedestal more than the sculpture. --Sebring12Hrs 20:18, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
@Sebring12Hrs: Thanks for looking. Perspective tweaked, and I've sharpened the sculpture, but I think you're right about the focus being a bit off. Am happy however you decide here. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Oriel windows in Stein am Rhein, Switzerland --JoachimKohler-HB 06:36, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review Comment Only the foreground windows and the panel are in focus. I think there is a DoF issue. Feel free to move it to discuss. --Sebring12Hrs 20:10, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
December 26, 2023[edit]
-
- Nomination: Grave of Constantin Tănase in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 19:40, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review
Perspective : vertical lines are leaning in. --Basile Morin 04:09, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Grave of Constantin Tănase in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 19:40, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review
Perspective : vertical lines are leaning in. --Basile Morin 04:08, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Close Wing Mating Pair of Eurema hecabe (Linnaeus, 1758) - Common Grass Yellow. This specimen belongs to sub species Eurema hecabe hecabe (Linnaeus, 1758) – Oriental Common Grass Yellow in India.This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 15:40, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review
Noisy background and lacking proper categorization --MB-one 11:53, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
December 25, 2023[edit]
-
- Nomination: Close Wing Nectaring of Acraea terpsicore (Linnaeus, 1758) - Tawny Coster. No subspecies are listed under this species in India.This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 16:56, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review
Looks good, but can you fix the dust spot (highlighted) please? --Mike Peel 08:51, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close Wing Mating Pair of Eurema hecabe (Linnaeus, 1758) - Common Grass Yellow. This specimen belongs to sub species Eurema hecabe hecabe (Linnaeus, 1758) – Oriental Common Grass Yellow in India.This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 16:55, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Comment Good, even though a bit low on details, probably heavily denoised. However, there is no species category and different species are mentioned in the image name and in the description. Please correct this. Then I can support this image. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:58, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Not done within a week. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
December 24, 2023[edit]
-
- Nomination: Close Wing Basking of Hypolimnas bolina (Linnaeus, 1758) - Great Eggfly (Male). This specimen belongs to sub species Hypolimnas bolina jacintha (Drury, 1773) – Oriental Great Eggfly in India.This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 17:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review
Looks good to me, but can you remove the dust spots (image notes added)? --Mike Peel 10:14, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
December 22, 2023[edit]
-
- Nomination Simple liptena (Liptena simplicia) --Charlesjsharp 21:47, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Blue fringes along the wing. --C messier 23:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Not done, also overall quality is insufficient. --Plozessor 05:42, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
December 21, 2023[edit]
-
- Nomination: Maastricht-NL, stadsdeel Wijck met de Sint-Martinuskerk vanaf de Servaasbrug --Michielverbeek 06:22, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- Review Nice light. I suggest removing the spots in the sky. --Milseburg 11:46, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for review, you were right, spots and insects are Doneremoved --Michielverbeek 20:21, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
@Michielverbeek: One more spot to remove (image noted added), could you also denoise please? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
December 20, 2023[edit]
-
- Nomination Neidingen in Belgium, chapel: the Sankt Antonius Kapelle --Michielverbeek 06:33, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Decline Looks underexposed to me, could you correct it in post? --Tuxyso 17:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
More light for this photo Done --Michielverbeek 19:55, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
@Michielverbeek: It's still dark, can you brighten it (by quite a bit)? Some denoising would also be good. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Not done Sorry, but this is still way too dark. --Plozessor 05:42, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
December 19, 2023[edit]
-
- Nomination Smart wearable belt with Microsoft Kinect and multiple LEDs at Maker Faire Berlin 2018 --MB-one 10:42, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
A bit noisy, needs better description. --C messier 22:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 13:36, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --C messier 20:30, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
Rules
These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.
- To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
- You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
- The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
- Using
{{support}}
or{{oppose}}
will make it easier to count your vote. - Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
- In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
- Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Oppose and Support if necessary.
- Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
- Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".
File:Fontano_de_la_frenezuloj,_Gubbio.JPG[edit]
- Nomination Fountain of fools, Gubbio, Italy --Super nabla 22:26, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Comment This is rotated, a bit noisy, and shadows are quite dark. --Plozessor 05:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- I tried to fix the rotation and slightly brightened the shadows. Super nabla 10:32, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:50, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- I tried to fix the rotation and slightly brightened the shadows. Super nabla 10:32, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It needs perspective correction and the sharpness is borderline. --C messier 20:25, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done I tried to fix the perspective. Super nabla 11:47, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Pörtschach_Winklern_Hauptstraße_Edelweißbad_Badesteg_25122023_0347.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Pier at the Edelweiß bath on Hauptstraße in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --Laitche 03:43, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
* Oppose I disagree. Clouds are looking overexposed to me. Fixable by reducing the higlights. --Milseburg 10:51, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done @Milseburg: Thanks for your review. I reduced the highlights of the clouds. —- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Something off at the edge between the left mountain and the clouds (CA gone wrong?). Colors are looking unnatural (such as using too much saturation/dynamics or increasing blue saturation). Lacking general sharpness (over-denoised?). --Plozessor 06:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks okay form me now. Criticism on the colors should concerning the whole series, I guess. --Milseburg (talk) 15:50, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I can live with the colors, but IMO the grey mountaintops, probably result of too aggressive CA removal, seem unacceptable. There is a ca. 5 to 8 pixels wide grey band on top of the left mountain. --Plozessor 19:35, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Luesia,_Zaragoza,_España,_2023-01-04,_DD_01.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Luesia, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 12:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 13:19, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. Too much sky. I don't think this composition is favorable here. --Milseburg 10:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support It wouldn't hurt to crop a part of the sky, but I don't see this as a big issue. --Plozessor 05:59, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support The horizon is arranged according to the rule of thirds, what's wrong with that? --Smial 15:35, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment You are applying an FPC criterion here. A photo that has little or no technical flaws should not be rejected on QIC purely because of a matter of taste (except for distracting clutter in the surroundings or background...). This sky gives this photo a certain impression of the vastness of the landscape. If you simply cut it off, you get a squeezed-together "Schlauchbild". However, if you change the camera orientation when you take the picture, you might end up with 50% completely uninteresting meadows in the foreground that dominate the picture and would rightly be criticised. Sky as a background does not dominate a landscape photo, it's background. --Smial 20:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The composition is criterion for a quality image. A landscape shot that consists of 2/3 of insignificant sky does not fulfill this. We don't know why the camera wasn't held a little further down. Therefore, only a cut can improve the image effect. I don't see any disadvatages in aspect ratios of long images. And yes, I find the sky too dominating. --Milseburg 23:33, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment You are applying an FPC criterion here. A photo that has little or no technical flaws should not be rejected on QIC purely because of a matter of taste (except for distracting clutter in the surroundings or background...). This sky gives this photo a certain impression of the vastness of the landscape. If you simply cut it off, you get a squeezed-together "Schlauchbild". However, if you change the camera orientation when you take the picture, you might end up with 50% completely uninteresting meadows in the foreground that dominate the picture and would rightly be criticised. Sky as a background does not dominate a landscape photo, it's background. --Smial 20:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
File:White-breasted_Woodswallow_(Artamus_leucorynchus)_at_Gili_Trawangan,_NTB.jpg[edit]
- Nomination White-breasted Woodswallow (Artamus leucorynchus) at Gili Trawangan, NTB --Eka343 16:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --Damayantidwi 07:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I know that this is a difficult shot, but the birds are very blurry even though they are only a very small part of the photograph. Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:58, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing except the right bird's beak is in focus. --Plozessor 05:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Ermita_de_la_Virgen_de_Puyal,_Luesia,_Zaragoza,_España,_2023-01-04,_DD_03.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Hermitage of Our Lady of Puyal, Luesia, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 12:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:04, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Please don't take it against me: In my opinion, a photo with such a distorted church tower and a squashed bell cannot be a quality image. -- Spurzem 14:27, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Fully agree with Spurzem, the distortion is weird, and like this the picture is anything but QI. Could be possible to fix it though.--Plozessor 07:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC)- Comment New version Poco a poco 09:17, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support New version is definitely better. Still looking a bit weird but way better than before and IMO acceptable. --Plozessor 11:44, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. At least now it's better than before. I cannot judge whether the bend in the cornice at the top of the tower and whether the slope of the steps correspond to reality. Also, the image below is cropped too tightly. It's still not a quality picture for me. -- Spurzem 12:33, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Anyone who has ever tried to correct wide-angle distortion knows about the problems. Sometimes it just doesn't get any better. Here, however, the solution is quite acceptable.--Ermell 15:39, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo Ermell, verstehe ich Dich richtig: Wenn ein gutes Bild nicht oder nur schwer machbar ist, muss ein misslungenes zwangsläufig als Qualitätsbild bewertet werden? Da denke ich wieder einmal an meine schwarze Katze im dunklen Keller ohne Licht. Viele Grüße und alles Gute für 2024 -- Spurzem 16:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Ich habe mal probiert: Ein kleines bisschen besser scheint es zu gehen. Optimal ist meine Bearbeitung allerdings auch nicht. -- Spurzem 17:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo Ermell, verstehe ich Dich richtig: Wenn ein gutes Bild nicht oder nur schwer machbar ist, muss ein misslungenes zwangsläufig als Qualitätsbild bewertet werden? Da denke ich wieder einmal an meine schwarze Katze im dunklen Keller ohne Licht. Viele Grüße und alles Gute für 2024 -- Spurzem 16:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Ich meinte das es of keinen besseren Standpunkt für ein optimalen Bild gibt zumal in diesem Fall das alte Gemäuer ziemlich schief ist. Deine Bearbeitung in allen Ehren aber die Fertigstellung des Werkes dürfte schwierig werden. Bei Pocos Version stört die Wölbung in Dach und Decke des Turmes. Das kann er ja vielleicht noch nachbessern. Dir auch ein gutes neues Jahr.--Ermell 14:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good job to everyone. --Sebring12Hrs 18:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The first version shows the typical problem when architectural shots are taken with an extreme wide-angle lens and these are also digitally verticalised. Even if everything has been done geometrically correctly, absurd perspectives are still created. The second version is crooked. --Smial 15:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment And we have lots of these here. Personally I'd prefer a more natural view, like it looked from the photographer's perspective. But I've learned quickly that QI promotion chances for anything not 100 % vertical are near zero. --Plozessor 19:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Perspective corrections, whether made digitally or optically with a shift lens, are important and often necessary technical means, primarily to compensate for minor imperfections. Unfortunately, however, they are often misused here to compulsively verticalise every, but really every image in order to avoid failing the assessment. Without regard for realistic representation of the conditions on site or photographic design aspects. Images have even been forced into a perfect rectangle, both vertically and horizontally, without thinking about how silly it looks when areas are covered that should actually be visible when looking at a window exactly vertically, for example. Optionally, buildings have no roofs, even though the architect has drawn and planned some. Which in turn makes the frequently used argument that you have to photograph buildings with exact verticals because the architect drew them that way seem absurd. Why doesn't this apply to roofs? Architects draw vertical walls so that the workers can build them vertically. --Smial 21:00, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- 👍👍👍 --Plozessor 05:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Perspective corrections, whether made digitally or optically with a shift lens, are important and often necessary technical means, primarily to compensate for minor imperfections. Unfortunately, however, they are often misused here to compulsively verticalise every, but really every image in order to avoid failing the assessment. Without regard for realistic representation of the conditions on site or photographic design aspects. Images have even been forced into a perfect rectangle, both vertically and horizontally, without thinking about how silly it looks when areas are covered that should actually be visible when looking at a window exactly vertically, for example. Optionally, buildings have no roofs, even though the architect has drawn and planned some. Which in turn makes the frequently used argument that you have to photograph buildings with exact verticals because the architect drew them that way seem absurd. Why doesn't this apply to roofs? Architects draw vertical walls so that the workers can build them vertically. --Smial 21:00, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment And we have lots of these here. Personally I'd prefer a more natural view, like it looked from the photographer's perspective. But I've learned quickly that QI promotion chances for anything not 100 % vertical are near zero. --Plozessor 19:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Sirikanya_Tansakun-2023-12-10.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Sirikanya Tansakun attends constitution day event --KrebsLovesFiesh 19:11, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- Discussion Photographed with too short focal length from too close distance, not a favorable image of the nice young woman and, in my opinion, not a quality image -- Spurzem 15:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Support Not perfect but good enough --MB-one 13:42, 31 December 2023 (UTC) - Oppose. As I said above: No QI for me -- Spurzem 14:56, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support IMO good enough. This is an extracted image. So the distance might have been different from what might be thought from this image. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:39, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment If the squint is the issue, then please check other images of the same person. May be she just has a squint. This may look better from an angle rather than from the front or be less obvious if the photo is taken from a larger distance. Or not. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:06, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Open_Wing_Basking_of_Symphaedra_nais_(Forster,_1771)_-_Baronet_WLB_DSC_2785.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Open Wing Basking of Symphaedra nais (Forster, 1771) - Baronet .No subspecies are listed under this species in India.This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 15:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 12:10, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Insufficient detail IMO, rather heavy noise because of very high ISO. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:23, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose If we apply the same standards as we do to other nominations then this is clearly below the bar. --Plozessor 07:07, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
File:BMW_i5_M60_1X7A1643.jpg[edit]
- Nomination BMW i5 M60 in Böblingen --Alexander-93 10:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 11:04, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. With all our understanding of kindness, we should not be too generous. The hood and windshield of the car are too bright, the reflection of the street lamp in the front window and the blue information sheet in the side window are very annoying and we don't even want to talk about the background. Please discuss whether the photo is really a quality image. -- Spurzem 14:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Spurzem. Use of a polarizer should take out most of the extra reflections. --GRDN711 02:50, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Hospital_General_de_La_Rioja_in_Logrono_(1).jpg[edit]
- Nomination Hospital General de La Rioja in Logrono, La Rioja, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:38, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I disagree. It is way too dark, it has a slight blue tint, and the building is leaned outward (though only by a few pixels). Should be easy to fix though. (Seems that my original comment was lost due add-in malfunction or editing conflict.) --Plozessor 08:23, 25 December 2023 (UTC) - Support Light is dull, but I think it's quite acceptable for a cloudy day. I don't see the perspective issue. Lines seem to be vertical to me. --Sebring12Hrs 12:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. I wouldn't try to take a quality image of a building under these weather conditions and at this time in January. Or should something special be represented? Furthermore, the perspective is not convincingly corrected; it seems unnatural. -- Spurzem 15:14, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Good attempt but agree with comments on being a little under-exposed and dull. A better day would make the difference. --GRDN711 02:58, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 8 after nomination)[edit]
- Wed 27 Dec → Thu 04 Jan
- Thu 28 Dec → Fri 05 Jan
- Fri 29 Dec → Sat 06 Jan
- Sat 30 Dec → Sun 07 Jan
- Sun 31 Dec → Mon 08 Jan
- Mon 01 Jan → Tue 09 Jan
- Tue 02 Jan → Wed 10 Jan
- Wed 03 Jan → Thu 11 Jan
- Thu 04 Jan → Fri 12 Jan